No single sensor wins against drones. These pages compare GOTEAM’s passive AI thermal detection with passive RF detection, active radar, other optical sensors and a vehicle-integrated counter-UAS system — at the level of the technique, quoting each vendor’s own published material, and each one says plainly where the other approach is stronger.
GOTEAM publishes detection up to 400 m, target- and scenario-dependent. Vendor material changes; each page carries its own sources and review date.
| Page | What it compares |
|---|---|
| GOTEAM vs DroneShield → | Passive thermal vs passive RF detection, plus a defeat portfolio |
| GOTEAM vs Dedrone → | A sensor that always looks vs RF-cued detection with radar/PTZ extensions |
| GOTEAM vs Echodyne → | Two sensor layers under C2: passive thermal vs electronically scanned radar |
| GOTEAM vs Robin Radar → | Passive thermal vs micro-Doppler 3D radar (IRIS) |
| GOTEAM vs cooled MWIR PTZ → | Fixed uncooled stare vs a steerable cooled mid-wave camera |
| GOTEAM vs Third Eye MeduzaX → | Staring vs scanning optical C-UAS |
| GOTEAM vs INKAS C-UAS → | A passive thermal detection layer vs a vehicle-integrated radar/RF, EO/IR and defeat chain |
Upload a clip to FlyBox and a GOTEAM field device processes it on real hardware, streaming back an annotated result with per-frame detections and range and bearing — your footage, our engine, no NDA required to start.